Tower Warden

Tidying up templating

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-27 11:11:18

Maybe make it a 1/4, 3W cost? Seems really expensive for a 2/2 tapper equivalent, and a pacifist doesn't want to be attacking - could add defender?

Paul Hodgson · 2012-05-28 11:34:29

Okay I made loads of changes to this. I think Paul's points are valid, and the card is simple enough to be a common

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-28 11:38:54

I now really like this guy as a pseudo-tapper who can save your own guys from combat tricks. Still not sure about things like this being Bears, though!

Kieran Symington · 2012-05-28 12:13:50

Yes I think the whole issue of bears being prevalent in every colour probably needs to be addressed. I'd almost say get rid of bear creature type altogether (save it for the all bear set). I imagine Ross just made them all bears to tie them together rather than as a creative decision.

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-28 12:18:53

Loxodon possibly?

Paul Hodgson · 2012-05-28 13:19:19

This guy is very strong because he can block as well as "tap". Probably needs to be a 1/1 or something. We errattaed him to untap the creature as well as remove it but he was still awesome. Good card and interesting twist on tapping but will have to think about if he is too good.

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-03 20:30:56

Nerfed him after testing him again last night so that he can't really block much. Also dropped cost as W has no 3-drop creature.

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-06 08:17:52

doesn't look like he has changed, did you not save them?

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-06-06 11:20:48

Misremembered our intended changes from playtesting.

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-10 10:37:01

Maybe it needs a W activation cost as well? Seems like facing two of these is quite sad especially as its common.

Allan Chong · 2012-07-03 13:25:35

Agreed with Allan's suggestion.

Thomas Baker · 2012-07-04 11:54:46