This (and cycle) might be pretty broken with any repeatable reveal effect e.g. deceiver
Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-26 16:16:27
Retired 2012-06-09 15:40:41
Towerfall · U
This (and cycle) might be pretty broken with any repeatable reveal effect e.g. deceiver
Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-26 16:16:27
true - we can balance them by either uping mana cost - or making you pay for the effect - there was a huge difference between burning vengence and furnace celebration because of the pay 2 - we should also be careful of the rarity of permenent reveal cards - and we could make these cards rare - we also need a lot of good enchantment removal
Ross Miles · 2012-05-26 16:16:28
Tidying up templating
Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-28 09:44:35
Another card that either wants to be reworded or scrapped given the nature of our reveals and Portent.
Thomas Baker · 2012-06-09 07:40:33
| Date | Person | Name | Cost | Type | Rules |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-05-28 09:44:35 | Simon O'Keeffe | Shred the Evidence | 3U | Enchantment | Whenever you reveal a card from the top of your library, if that card is blue, target player puts the top 3 cards of their library into their graveyard. |
| 2012-05-26 15:27:37 | Ross Miles | Shred the Evidence | 3U | Enchantment | whenever you reveal a card from the top of your library, if that card is blue, target player puts the top 3 cards of there library into their graveyard |