Foloi Thoroughbred

wording needs correcting

Glenn Goldsworthy · 2012-05-29 10:13:39

Templating fixes

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-29 10:23:54

this could easily be a 3/3, at 2/2 for 4cmc it's pretty crappy as you're only going to hit ~30% of the time in limited and it'll just trade with their 3 drop.

Paul Hodgson · 2012-05-29 11:12:06

i like the idea of some cards being a bit rubbsih with the same effect as otehr cards that are good - they always do this - take solebond some are great some not so much - i think it is important to have a range rather than everything being good - its still playable

Ross Miles · 2012-05-29 15:26:37

Plus I think the chances may well be higher considering the manipulation in the set. If we really wanted to tweak this guy you could make it trigger on becoming blocked. Kind of gives him green evasion. Problem is he would trigger differently to the other cards.

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-29 15:29:08

@Ross - fair point, however G is meant to be the big dudes colour, and this isn't a big dude, he's a 2/2 for 4 who uncommonly becomes a 4/4. Druid's familiar is a 4/4 about the right amount of the time (the other +2/+2 pushes it over the top). A 4/4 for 4 is not inconceivable in Green - Sporethrower thallid was 2GG iirc

Paul Hodgson · 2012-05-29 15:33:41

Centaurs!

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-30 14:45:24

Switiching name with Pelion-Clan Warband

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-30 15:19:35

Does it make more sense for the toughness to be the higher value? Then there are more cases where he can attack. We should test the centaurs more now that we are all-in on them! :)

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-01 21:35:21

The 2/3 for 3 that gets +1/+1 on the reveal just seems much better costed than this one.

Kieran Symington · 2012-06-01 21:44:47

Actually this guy is fine at 3/3. Think of that 3/3 for 4G in AVR that *always* becomes a 5/5 on your turn.

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-01 22:13:20