Ludicrous Blunder

We didn't seem to have a Pyroclasm variant, which is pretty common in most sets

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-05-28 14:59:27

Kills so much of the format as it stands right now - sadly including basically all the R creatures that enable the Madness cost!

Thomas Baker · 2012-05-31 17:04:22

Possibly kills too may looters to be good?

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-03 20:42:55

Awkward. I still feel we need some kind of red sweeper. We could jack the cost up and make it only affect opponent?

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-06-03 22:24:00

Only opponent sweepers tend to be bomby (Marsh Casualties, Lavalanche) so I am wary of that. Might be fine. If you are sweeping away your own Radical Mage and three of their guys you will be perfectly happy.

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-14 11:27:43

I had this last night, but never once cast it. It seemed like it was going to be good as I had so few creatures in my deck, but I had enough point removal that I never needed the sweeper effect. I still think it has a place.

Simon O'Keeffe · 2012-06-14 13:35:17

It does seem like it should be good - I can remember having three 2-toughness creatures out at least once last night.

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-14 15:31:56

Given our doubts about this and the fact that we only want 3 uncommon R noncreatures. Can this get in ahead of Soulstoking, Empty the Libraries and a looting spell? Retire?

Thomas Baker · 2012-06-14 17:30:01