Purity of Body

Maybe target non-white creature? Pure//Simple kind of has one half of this already, and it is RG

Simon O'Keeffe · 2014-03-17 21:57:16

(Playtesting) Rots in hand or snags their bomb. Therefore swingy. Might have felt that way because all the 2-color creatures I was playing with were 2 drops.

Thomas Baker · 2014-04-12 20:39:10

This is obviously pretty bad in an all commons playtest, but probably gets a bit less swingy once some quality uncommons and rares are in play. Perhaps that is bad? Do we want a more generally playable removal spell at common?

Simon O'Keeffe · 2014-04-12 20:45:14

another option would be to word it something like "destroy target non-white creature". Keeps it conditional but much more useful against commons.

Simon O'Keeffe · 2014-04-14 15:45:42

Fatewarp might be the thing that makes this passable at common.

Simon O'Keeffe · 2014-05-13 11:33:07

This is either the ideal Fatewarp card or the example of why it is terrible. You pretty much always want to float this at the top of your library until you get their wedge bomb with it. Is that good gameplay or not? I don't know. Does let the opponent know to run out their second best multicolored creature or try and put enough pressure on to cause you to bottom it. I think it's good?

Thomas Baker · 2014-05-21 18:44:53

Removing Fatewarp but giving a slight upgrade. White generally has some form of limited removal for any type of permanent.

Kieran Symington · 2014-05-24 10:52:56

We seem to have turned this into a sideboard card. Not sure if that matters or not.

Thomas Baker · 2014-05-26 11:45:54

I would probably always maindeck this. The multicolour cards are probably all going to be bombs.

Kieran Symington · 2014-05-26 17:52:27

This sat in my hand a lot, and I obviously boarded it out vs Bakers two colour deck. I guess once the rares arrive this will be better

Simon O'Keeffe · 2014-06-08 09:29:56